Yes, wigs still appear in English courts, especially in criminal proceedings, but the old rule is no longer as simple as "everyone wears a wig." Court dress has been narrowed, relaxed, and challenged over time.
Where wigs are still most visible
Traditional horsehair wigs are still associated with judges and barristers in criminal courts. They communicate continuity, formality, and the idea that the courtroom role is bigger than the individual person.
Where wigs are not always required
Family, civil, and Supreme Court settings have moved away from the most formal wig requirements. Recent reporting also notes reforms and trials that allow barristers to go without wigs in certain criminal-court situations for comfort, cultural, disability, or practical reasons.
Why the tradition is controversial
Supporters say wigs create dignity, neutrality, and a visual separation between ordinary life and the courtroom. Critics say they are outdated, uncomfortable, culturally narrow, and sometimes impractical for natural Black hairstyles, religious coverings, menopause, pregnancy, or disability needs.
So do judges still wear them?
Some do, depending on court type and role. But the direction of travel is flexibility rather than total abolition. The wig remains a legal symbol, but it is no longer treated as untouchable.
Bottom line
British court wigs are still real, but the tradition is changing. If you are picturing every judge in every English courtroom wearing a white wig every day, that picture is outdated.
